AI Guides › Claude Mastery

Claude For Research: A Workflow, Not A Single Question

By Nigel Guy · 2 min read

The most common way people "do research" with Claude is to ask one big question — "what's the state of the market for X" — and take whatever comes back as the research. It reads thoroughly, it's organised into neat sections, and it feels like the work is done. What actually happened is one pass, at one moment, framed by however the question happened to be worded — which is closer to a first draft of research than research itself.

The mechanism: the four-pass structure

1. Scope pass. Before asking for findings, ask what the actual question is and what would count as a good answer to it. Vague topics produce vague research; a tightly scoped question ("which of these three approaches has the strongest evidence, and what's the evidence") produces something you can actually use.
2. Gather pass. Ask the substantive question, ideally more than once from different angles — the strongest case for a position, then separately the strongest case against it. A single framing tends to surface a single, self-consistent narrative, which can feel complete while quietly leaving out whatever it didn't think to mention.
3. Pressure-test pass. Ask what the weakest part of the answer is, what evidence would change it, and what a well-informed sceptic would say. This is the pass that catches an answer that sounded right but was built on a thin or singular source.
4. Verify pass. For anything specific — a statistic, a named source, a claim you'll repeat elsewhere — check it independently before using it. This is the one step in the sequence that can't be delegated back to the same conversation; it needs an outside source.

What to skip

Skip asking for "more detail" as a substitute for the pressure-test pass — more detail in the same direction isn't the same as checking the direction itself. And skip treating a single well-written answer as multiple sources just because it's long; length is not the same as independent corroboration.

Guardrails

• Claude's knowledge has a cutoff and gaps, and doesn't have live access to everything happening now unless you're specifically using a connected search or browsing capability — for anything current, say so and check the date on what comes back.
• Research done this way still reflects the limits of a single tool's training and reasoning — for material going into something formal (academic, legal, financial, medical), independent primary-source verification isn't optional, it's the actual research.
• A well-structured answer and a well-supported answer are different things — structure is easy to produce and easy to mistake for rigour, so judge the pressure-test pass on its substance, not its formatting.

All 751 AI guides · JulieMango plans from £17/mo