AI Guides › Claude Mastery
Building A Personal Style Guide Claude Actually Follows
By Nigel Guy · 2 min read
You tell Claude "write in my voice" once, get something close, and then spend every session after that re-explaining the same handful of preferences — shorter sentences, no exclamation marks, stop starting emails with "I hope this finds you well." A verbal instruction lives in one conversation and dies with it. You end up teaching the same lesson forever instead of writing it down once.
The rule: a style guide only works if it's a document Claude can be pointed at, not a memory it's meant to infer from past chats.
The mechanism
- Write down what you're actually correcting, not what you think good writing is. Go back through recent edits you've made to Claude's drafts and note the pattern — do you keep cutting the opening line, shortening the close, removing hedges? Real corrections beat abstract taste every time.
- Split it into "always," "never," and "depends." A short guide with three real always-rules beats a long one that lists every stylistic preference you have with equal weight.
- Give examples, not just adjectives. "Direct, not blunt" means nothing on its own. One sentence you'd keep and one you'd rewrite, side by side, teaches the distinction in a way the adjective can't.
- Keep it to about half a page. A style guide that reads like a brand manual won't get reread or referenced; a short one you can paste at the top of any new chat will.
- Reattach it every session, or store it somewhere Claude can be told to check. A style guide's value is in its consistent presence, not its one-time existence — if you have Projects or persistent memory available, put it there so you're not pasting it manually each time.
- Update it when it's wrong, not when it's imperfect. Revise the guide when Claude's output — following the guide correctly — still isn't what you wanted. That's a gap in the guide, not a failure of the model to read your mind.
What to skip
Skip trying to encode "sound smart" or "sound professional" as rules — those aren't style, they're outcomes, and a guide built from outcomes instead of concrete instructions gives Claude nothing to actually follow. And skip perfecting the guide before using it; a rough version tested against three real drafts teaches you more than a week spent polishing an untested one.
Guardrails
- A style guide shapes tone and structure reliably. It won't reliably override factual instructions or reasoning approach — don't bury a "be careful with numbers" instruction inside a style document and expect it to carry the same weight as an explicit ask each time.
- Review the guide occasionally against what you're actually asking for now — voice preferences drift as the kind of writing you're doing changes, and a stale guide gives confidently wrong instructions.
- This is a preference document, not a legal or brand-compliance one — if your organisation has an actual mandated style guide, that takes precedence, and this is for the personal layer on top of it.
All 751 AI guides · JulieMango plans from £17/mo