AI Guides › Trend Watch
By Nigel Guy · 2 min read
When a new AI regulation is announced, coverage tends to split into two camps: it changes everything, or it changes nothing. You read both, feel vaguely uneasy, and either do nothing concrete or lose an afternoon to commentary about a law whose obligations may not touch you at all. Following the debate feels like responsible preparation. It usually isn't — it's compliance theatre without the compliance.
The rule: ask one question — "what, specifically, would I have to do differently, and from when?" — and don't spend further time on any regulation until you can answer it, even if the answer is "nothing".
Answering the one question needs four facts. Fill them in from primary sources — the text itself, or the regulator's own guidance — rather than from commentary.
| Field | What to find | Where to look |
|---|---|---|
| Who it applies to | Which roles, organisation sizes, sectors or locations | The scope section; official guidance |
| What it applies to | Which uses, systems or kinds of data | The definitions section |
| What it requires | Concrete duties: disclose, document, assess, register, stop | The obligations sections; official summaries |
| From when | Start dates and any phased deadlines | The official timetable |
If a field is still blank after a reasonable look, write "unclear" rather than guessing. An honest blank tells you where to ask; a guess hides the gap.
Skip opinion pieces about whether the regulation is good or bad until you know whether it applies to you — you can form a view later. Skip social threads explaining "what this means for everyone"; it rarely means the same thing for everyone. And skip reading drafts, proposals and consultations as if they were final law.